WASHINGTON — Members of the U.S. Congress on Monday began debating the next steps for reviewing and potentially ratifying elements of a newly announced peace framework between the United States and Iran, following the announcement of a preliminary agreement intended to end months of conflict between the two countries. Congressional leaders and administration officials said details of any formal legislative action remain under discussion.
The framework, announced by U.S. President Donald Trump and Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, calls for a halt to military operations, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and further negotiations on unresolved issues, including Iran’s nuclear program. The memorandum of understanding is expected to be formally signed in Switzerland later this week, according to statements from U.S., Iranian and Pakistani officials.
Administration officials have indicated that any final agreement involving long-term nuclear commitments or sanctions relief could require congressional review. Reuters reported that the current framework leaves key nuclear issues to a 60-day negotiating period, during which U.S. and Iranian representatives are expected to seek a broader settlement.
Lawmakers from both parties offered differing views on the emerging agreement. Some members welcomed the prospect of ending hostilities and reducing tensions in the Middle East, while others questioned whether the framework adequately addresses Iran’s nuclear activities and regional policies. Details of the final text have not been publicly released, and several lawmakers said they would reserve judgment until additional information becomes available.
“The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete,” Trump wrote on social media on Sunday, referring to the framework agreement announced by negotiators. Iranian officials, meanwhile, have described the arrangement as a preliminary step and said further discussions remain necessary before a comprehensive settlement can be reached.
Congress has already been engaged in debate over U.S. involvement in the conflict. Earlier this month, both chambers advanced war powers measures aimed at limiting the administration’s authority to continue military operations without congressional approval, reflecting growing concern among lawmakers about the scope and duration of the conflict.
As debate continued on Capitol Hill on Monday, congressional leaders said no timetable had been established for formal consideration of any final agreement. Administration officials said negotiations with Iran would continue during the ceasefire period, while lawmakers awaited additional details before determining whether legislative approval would be required.
